<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ingredients of Web 2.0 Success: the Video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://qwerky.stellify.net/scribbles/ingredients-of-web-20-success-the-video/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://qwerky.stellify.net/scribbles/ingredients-of-web-20-success-the-video</link>
	<description>Notebook of the Weirdest New Web 2.0 Names!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 04:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Phrazr : Qwerky, Notebook of the Weirdest New Web 2.0 Names!</title>
		<link>http://qwerky.stellify.net/scribbles/ingredients-of-web-20-success-the-video#comment-5142</link>
		<dc:creator>Phrazr : Qwerky, Notebook of the Weirdest New Web 2.0 Names!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 10:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qwerky.stellify.net/scribbles/ingredients-of-web-20-success-the-video#comment-5142</guid>
		<description>[...] Phrazr, on the other hand, could&#8217;ve gotten better inspiration in coming up with a more Web 2.0-looking site. After all, when you use a Flickr-inspired site name, you&#8217;re supposed to be a Web 2.0 company too, right? Score: 3/51; Formula: Bastardized English, The &#8216;R&#8217; Thang, Vowel Drop; Circle No.: 3, The Pseudo-Abstract; Notable Web 2.0 Features: None (ok, fine, &#8220;user-generated content&#8221; is there&#8230;) Tags: bastardized english, layout, the r thang, user generated content, vowel dropRelated Posts: Blufr, Top Social Networks of 2006 Announced!, Curbly, Wishlistr, Beggr, Certifyr, Flickr, Wesabe    &#171; Top Social Networks of 2006 Announced! &#124; Home &#124; Urbis &#187; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Phrazr, on the other hand, could&#8217;ve gotten better inspiration in coming up with a more Web 2.0-looking site. After all, when you use a Flickr-inspired site name, you&#8217;re supposed to be a Web 2.0 company too, right? Score: 3/51; Formula: Bastardized English, The &#8216;R&#8217; Thang, Vowel Drop; Circle No.: 3, The Pseudo-Abstract; Notable Web 2.0 Features: None (ok, fine, &#8220;user-generated content&#8221; is there&#8230;) Tags: bastardized english, layout, the r thang, user generated content, vowel dropRelated Posts: Blufr, Top Social Networks of 2006 Announced!, Curbly, Wishlistr, Beggr, Certifyr, Flickr, Wesabe    &laquo; Top Social Networks of 2006 Announced! | Home | Urbis &raquo; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ia</title>
		<link>http://qwerky.stellify.net/scribbles/ingredients-of-web-20-success-the-video#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>ia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2006 00:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qwerky.stellify.net/scribbles/ingredients-of-web-20-success-the-video#comment-402</guid>
		<description>epsilon:
ah, can't these companies get to epsilon any faster? at least flickr's reached gamma recently.

business model:
well, depends if you set out to make money or spend money. everybody loves having fun with web 2.0, maybe that's why people hate it so much as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>epsilon:<br />
ah, can&#8217;t these companies get to epsilon any faster? at least flickr&#8217;s reached gamma recently.</p>
<p>business model:<br />
well, depends if you set out to make money or spend money. everybody loves having fun with web 2.0, maybe that&#8217;s why people hate it so much as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jangelo</title>
		<link>http://qwerky.stellify.net/scribbles/ingredients-of-web-20-success-the-video#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>jangelo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 20:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qwerky.stellify.net/scribbles/ingredients-of-web-20-success-the-video#comment-385</guid>
		<description>So now Web 2.0 is a formula. Though I would say that "Web 2.0" success doesn't necsesarily translate to success in the real world. Wouldn't you think so, too?

At any rate, it shouldn't have to have a business model. But it should be helluva lot fun!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So now Web 2.0 is a formula. Though I would say that &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; success doesn&#8217;t necsesarily translate to success in the real world. Wouldn&#8217;t you think so, too?</p>
<p>At any rate, it shouldn&#8217;t have to have a business model. But it should be helluva lot fun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corsarius</title>
		<link>http://qwerky.stellify.net/scribbles/ingredients-of-web-20-success-the-video#comment-382</link>
		<dc:creator>Corsarius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 19:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qwerky.stellify.net/scribbles/ingredients-of-web-20-success-the-video#comment-382</guid>
		<description>gah!! that was entertaining :P especially the hugs and rounded corners one. but the &lt;em&gt;squdoctppr&lt;/em&gt; epsilon (and the logo!) takes the cake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gah!! that was entertaining :P especially the hugs and rounded corners one. but the <em>squdoctppr</em> epsilon (and the logo!) takes the cake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
